Total Disaster Programs in Yuba County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 605
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $29,939,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard Wilbur Ranch | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $939,756 |
2 | Golden Valley Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $727,022 |
3 | Johl Orchards | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $718,084 |
4 | Williams Group | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $685,632 |
5 | Albert Lassaga | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $583,549 |
6 | Smith Ranches B G M | Marysville, CA 95901 | $579,455 |
7 | Auburn Ravine Ranch Inc | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $512,064 |
8 | De Palma Orchards Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $484,987 |
9 | Kalkat Bros & Sons | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $455,122 |
10 | Rancho Cenedella Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $425,582 |
11 | K-four Farms | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $341,923 |
12 | Dalvir Gill | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $337,440 |
13 | Jasmin K Thiara | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $304,522 |
14 | Kalkat Bros | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $301,610 |
15 | Oak Tree Farms Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $291,774 |
16 | Rahul Family Farms Lp | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $290,222 |
17 | Daljit Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $285,114 |
18 | Sukhbir S Nagra | Vacaville, CA 95687 | $279,534 |
19 | Charles Deforest | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $270,204 |
20 | Heir And Sons Orchards | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $254,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>