Market Loss Assistance Program in Yuba County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 279
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $21,072,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M & W Farms | Woodland, CA 95695 | $174,932 |
22 | M & S Land Company | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $168,484 |
23 | Maurice Green | Colusa, CA 95932 | $159,398 |
24 | Queirolo Farms | Hopland, CA 95449 | $158,732 |
25 | Mathews Co-tenants | Marysville, CA 95901 | $149,024 |
26 | Estate Of Raynette Cox | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $141,922 |
27 | William Austin Baggett | Marysville, CA 95901 | $139,888 |
28 | Josh Baggett | Marysville, CA 95901 | $139,888 |
29 | Coleman Foley Inc | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $139,888 |
30 | Sharon S Davis | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $139,768 |
31 | Keith Davis | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $139,762 |
32 | Adrienne Moffat Provo Rev Liv Tru | Burlingame, CA 94010 | $139,685 |
33 | Sheila H Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $138,941 |
34 | Rena Scheiber | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $137,743 |
35 | Norene Ranches Inc | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $136,513 |
36 | James J Hill III | Monterey, CA 93942 | $135,490 |
37 | W Moffat Drake Fmly Trust Of 199 | Marysville, CA 95901 | $135,188 |
38 | O I I Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $135,031 |
39 | William E Boardman | Marysville, CA 95901 | $134,630 |
40 | R & F Farming LLC | Marysville, CA 95901 | $134,212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”