Total Commodity Programs in Yuba County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 787
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yuba County, California totaled $175,491,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Eight In One | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $834,432 |
62 | William Paul Baggett | Marysville, CA 95901 | $833,610 |
63 | Charles Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $830,665 |
64 | Charles Doll | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $786,158 |
65 | Jean/marie Alfaro Partn | San Francisco, CA 94122 | $767,088 |
66 | Rick Sohrakoff | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $763,441 |
67 | Foley Ranches | Willows, CA 95988 | $756,560 |
68 | Eager Christiansen & Rue | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $752,206 |
69 | Elroy Morello | Marysville, CA 95901 | $742,857 |
70 | Starlet Inc | Sacramento, CA 95833 | $716,730 |
71 | Bill Bertolini Farms Inc | Marysville, CA 95901 | $711,138 |
72 | Michelle D Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $704,244 |
73 | Cl Hofman Family Farm | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $698,461 |
74 | Imperial Orchards LLC | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $694,159 |
75 | Edward Mathews | Marysville, CA 95901 | $677,343 |
76 | Delean I Davis 1994 Rev Inter Viv | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $673,781 |
77 | Waltz Brothers Rice Inc | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $672,416 |
78 | Wayne Staas | Marysville, CA 95901 | $669,166 |
79 | Ernest H Hofman | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $662,271 |
80 | Five B Farming | Rocklin, CA 95765 | $661,259 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”