Market Gains in Fambro Warehouse Company, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,106
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Fambro Warehouse Company totaled $158,943,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Colorado River Indian Tribes Farm | Parker, AZ 85344 | $435,606 |
42 | Silver Bullet Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $435,336 |
43 | Dgl Planting Co LLC | Wilson, AR 72395 | $430,061 |
44 | Barnes & Sons | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $425,063 |
45 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $420,822 |
46 | King Ranch Inc | Kingsville, TX 78364 | $419,733 |
47 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $417,402 |
48 | Mid-south Family Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $417,389 |
49 | Morgan Farms | Rector, AR 72461 | $414,659 |
50 | Riverbend Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $414,418 |
51 | Brynn-con Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $409,693 |
52 | Terra Bella Farms | Fresno, CA 93711 | $405,544 |
53 | Terra Linda Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $401,235 |
54 | R B Stimson Farms Ptr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $398,284 |
55 | Danny Day Jr & Son Partnership | Tillar, AR 71670 | $397,301 |
56 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $395,530 |
57 | Cross County Farms Partnership | Caldwell, AR 72322 | $386,097 |
58 | Manning Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $384,908 |
59 | Apple Farms | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $383,142 |
60 | Salzman Farms | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $381,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”