Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Colorado, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,388
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Colorado totaled $52,973,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sunset Land & Cattle LLC | Edmond, OK 73083 | $149,944 |
22 | Everett Jackson Jr | Kim, CO 81049 | $149,035 |
23 | Emick Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $141,136 |
24 | Valley View Ranch LLC | Mancos, CO 81328 | $132,638 |
25 | May Farms | Lamar, CO 81052 | $129,037 |
26 | Oldland Brothers Inc | Rifle, CO 81650 | $125,536 |
27 | Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch Ent | Towaoc, CO 81334 | $125,234 |
28 | Rock Ridge Cattle Company | Des Moines, NM 88418 | $119,695 |
29 | Jim R Unger | Yuma, CO 80759 | $118,475 |
30 | Nottingham Land & Livestock Lllp | Craig, CO 81626 | $117,875 |
31 | Albert Camilletti & Sons Inc | Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 | $117,875 |
32 | Etchart Livestock Inc | Montrose, CO 81403 | $117,875 |
33 | Peak Ranch Inc | Kremmling, CO 80459 | $117,875 |
34 | Edmundson Ranches LLC | Walsenburg, CO 81089 | $117,875 |
35 | P Diamond Livestock LLC | Rand, CO 80473 | $117,875 |
36 | Timberline Cattle Inc | Sanford, CO 81151 | $117,875 |
37 | Mitchell Ranch Inc | Crook, CO 80726 | $117,875 |
38 | Dustin Leplatt | Trinidad, CO 81082 | $117,875 |
39 | Chaquaco Cattle Company LLC | Kim, CO 81049 | $117,875 |
40 | Cross Canyon Grazing Association Lllp | Lewis, CO 81327 | $117,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”