Farm Subsidy information
Colorado
Total Subsidies in Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 66,840
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Colorado totaled $9,630,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cooksey Farms | Roggen, CO 80652 | $3,384,886 |
62 | Westberg & Rosling Farms | Roggen, CO 80652 | $3,383,221 |
63 | North Fork Farms Of Walsh | Walsh, CO 81090 | $3,366,916 |
64 | Colorado Farms | Lake Ozark, MO 65049 | $3,331,730 |
65 | Diana J Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,325,020 |
66 | Simon Farms | Stratton, CO 80836 | $3,323,776 |
67 | Shelton Land & Cattle Ltd | La Salle, CO 80645 | $3,323,293 |
68 | Belin Farms Inc | Wichita, KS 67202 | $3,301,989 |
69 | Duvall Ranches Inc | Granada, CO 81041 | $3,274,110 |
70 | D & C Schulte Crp Partnership | Greeley, CO 80631 | $3,268,311 |
71 | Barry Hinkhouse | Burlington, CO 80807 | $3,267,712 |
72 | Longs Peak Dairy LLC | Pierce, CO 80650 | $3,210,519 |
73 | Dionisio Produce And Farms LLC | Pueblo, CO 81006 | $3,115,349 |
74 | Burl M Scherler | Brandon, CO 81071 | $3,088,286 |
75 | Nottingham Land & Livestock Lllp | Craig, CO 81626 | $3,080,414 |
76 | Catherine Scherler | Brandon, CO 81071 | $3,065,815 |
77 | Daisy Lane Dairy Inc | Cope, CO 80812 | $3,052,057 |
78 | Edward E & Sheri Jones Jv | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,045,829 |
79 | Barth & Barth Partnership | Holly, CO 81047 | $3,043,123 |
80 | Craig Farms Gp | Byers, CO 80103 | $3,041,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”