Farm Subsidy information
Colorado
Total Subsidies in Colorado, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 17,379
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Colorado totaled $456,378,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | North Fork Farms Of Walsh | Walsh, CO 81090 | $224,662 |
102 | High Plains Produce Inc | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $218,555 |
103 | Levalley Ranch II Ltd Rllp | Hotchkiss, CO 81419 | $218,060 |
104 | Carlyle W Currier | Molina, CO 81646 | $217,867 |
105 | Mex & Sons Lllp | Norwood, CO 81423 | $217,757 |
106 | Frontier Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $216,008 |
107 | Eastern High Plains Ranch | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $214,977 |
108 | Golden Grain Farms Inc | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $212,719 |
109 | Matthew Dziedzic | Bayfield, CO 81122 | $212,652 |
110 | Penny Cattle Co LLC | Burlington, CO 80807 | $211,588 |
111 | Maranville Farms Partnership | Ramah, CO 80832 | $210,882 |
112 | Grand Farming Enterprises Inc | Flagler, CO 80815 | $210,477 |
113 | Rodney A Hume | Walsh, CO 81090 | $209,967 |
114 | Gloria Crowther | La Jara, CO 81140 | $209,456 |
115 | Ark Farms Partnership | Wray, CO 80758 | $208,625 |
116 | Eagle Farms | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $208,091 |
117 | Collie Farms Partnership | Arriba, CO 80804 | $207,770 |
118 | Charles Klausner Damian Klausner George Klausner P | Roggen, CO 80652 | $207,572 |
119 | Mitchell Ranch Inc | Crook, CO 80726 | $205,752 |
120 | Brian Luke Larie | Bradford, AR 72020 | $203,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”