Total Commodity Programs in Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 49,258
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colorado totaled $3,592,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Six Mile Farms Partnership | Yuma, CO 80759 | $1,838,958 |
122 | Smart Bros Inc | Atwood, CO 80722 | $1,838,140 |
123 | Cervi Enterprises | Greeley, CO 80632 | $1,829,567 |
124 | Breidenbach Bros Inc | Iliff, CO 80736 | $1,828,006 |
125 | Heintges Farms Inc | Burlington, CO 80807 | $1,827,082 |
126 | Carlson Land Co | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $1,821,910 |
127 | Raymond E Carpio | Kersey, CO 80644 | $1,820,763 |
128 | Johnson Dairy LLC | Eaton, CO 80615 | $1,820,134 |
129 | Anne Newman | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $1,820,030 |
130 | Tomes Farms Partnership | Burlington, CO 80807 | $1,813,501 |
131 | Keith Bath | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $1,810,927 |
132 | Box Elder Ranch Inc | Wray, CO 80758 | $1,794,167 |
133 | Ronald Drosselmeyer | Two Buttes, CO 81084 | $1,793,238 |
134 | Stuart Chapman | Vernon, CO 80755 | $1,789,450 |
135 | M & L Cattle Co | Yuma, CO 80759 | $1,775,340 |
136 | Legacy Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $1,766,667 |
137 | Maurice Wilder | Havana, IL 62644 | $1,762,329 |
138 | Yuma County Dairy LLC | Yuma, CO 80759 | $1,754,393 |
139 | Covenant Farms | Wray, CO 80758 | $1,749,734 |
140 | Helling Brothers | Wray, CO 80758 | $1,744,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”