Farm Subsidy information
Colorado
Total Subsidies in Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66,840
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Colorado totaled $9,630,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Klausner Damian Klausner George Klausner P | Roggen, CO 80652 | $5,357,981 |
22 | Lenz Farms | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $5,347,159 |
23 | Gardner Farms | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $5,295,218 |
24 | Ute Mountain Tribe | Towaoc, CO 81334 | $5,245,453 |
25 | Collie Farms Partnership | Arriba, CO 80804 | $5,138,039 |
26 | Wilton Earle & Sons | Craig, CO 81625 | $4,977,124 |
27 | H2o Farms | Walsh, CO 81090 | $4,926,374 |
28 | Bledsoe Cattle Company Lllp | Wray, CO 80758 | $4,886,795 |
29 | J&k Farm Operations | Bennett, CO 80102 | $4,771,838 |
30 | Penny Ranch Partnership | Burlington, CO 80807 | $4,669,529 |
31 | Raftopoulos Brothers Livestock | Craig, CO 81625 | $4,596,295 |
32 | Robert G Weber | Sheridan Lake, CO 81071 | $4,413,234 |
33 | Jaeger Farms Of Colorado | Merino, CO 80741 | $4,307,309 |
34 | Sprague Farms | Wray, CO 80758 | $4,294,362 |
35 | J-t Farms | Yuma, CO 80759 | $4,202,218 |
36 | Richard Roth Farms | Yuma, CO 80759 | $4,168,372 |
37 | Britten Gold Track Farms | Haswell, CO 81045 | $4,166,002 |
38 | J-s Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $4,133,484 |
39 | Mulch Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $4,123,931 |
40 | Kramer Feedlot Gp | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $3,910,942 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”