Direct Payment Program in Colorado, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 27,407
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Colorado totaled $803,907,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Norbert J & Elizabeth A Dvorak Prtnr | Burlington, CO 80807 | $605,422 |
| 62 | J & J Partnership | Stratton, CO 80836 | $605,240 |
| 63 | Pachner Agri Enterprises | Akron, CO 80720 | $592,589 |
| 64 | Triple J Farms | Bennett, CO 80102 | $589,586 |
| 65 | Martin Angus Ranch Gp | Wray, CO 80758 | $587,685 |
| 66 | James & Darlene D Dvorak Prtnr | Burlington, CO 80807 | $583,000 |
| 67 | Geisick Brothers | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $578,858 |
| 68 | Epple Ranch | Roggen, CO 80652 | $577,566 |
| 69 | Lmr Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $572,527 |
| 70 | Ss Shiloh Ptr | Towner, CO 81071 | $570,615 |
| 71 | Bruce & Shirley K Gerk | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $568,886 |
| 72 | Tdc Farms | Kirk, CO 80824 | $567,970 |
| 73 | Diamond A Farms General Partnership | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $564,744 |
| 74 | Hinkhouse Family Partnership | Burlington, CO 80807 | $560,552 |
| 75 | Ruth Dba Ruth M Harm M Buller | Sheridan Lake, CO 81071 | $554,774 |
| 76 | Firme Brothers Gp | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $551,787 |
| 77 | Osmus & Sons | Wray, CO 80758 | $551,184 |
| 78 | Herman Farms | Seibert, CO 80834 | $547,840 |
| 79 | Fiechter Brothers | Otis, CO 80743 | $547,735 |
| 80 | Eastern High Plains Ranch | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $536,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf