Farm Subsidy information
Alamosa County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Alamosa County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 508
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alamosa County, Colorado totaled $100,660,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $471,709 |
22 | Golden Valley Inc | Aurora, CO 80015 | $449,413 |
23 | Brian D Brownell | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $447,758 |
24 | Barbara Kruse | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $440,538 |
25 | Curto Family Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $439,614 |
26 | Dwayne Catalano | Mosca, CO 81146 | $423,800 |
27 | Angelina Ortega | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $399,599 |
28 | Venancio Beltran | Mosca, CO 81146 | $394,776 |
29 | Neufeld Farms Ltd | Hooper, CO 81136 | $386,604 |
30 | Frontier Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $379,857 |
31 | Rancho Rio Grande | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $376,172 |
32 | Asbell Farms LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $359,366 |
33 | Gregory Wright | Castle Rock, CO 80104 | $356,948 |
34 | Jerry A Brown | Mosca, CO 81146 | $335,995 |
35 | Chiles Farm | Hooper, CO 81136 | $306,518 |
36 | Gerald Ziegler | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $302,210 |
37 | Trudi Kretsinger | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $300,902 |
38 | David Holland | Hooper, CO 81136 | $294,232 |
39 | Allen R Entz | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $284,045 |
40 | John D Kretsinger | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $282,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”