Farm Subsidy information
Alamosa County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Alamosa County, Colorado, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 496
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alamosa County, Colorado totaled $88,358,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $443,709 |
22 | Curto Family Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $435,239 |
23 | Dwayne Catalano | Mosca, CO 81146 | $381,800 |
24 | Frontier Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $379,857 |
25 | Rancho Rio Grande | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $376,172 |
26 | Neufeld Farms Ltd | Hooper, CO 81136 | $362,286 |
27 | Gregory Wright | Castle Rock, CO 80104 | $356,948 |
28 | Barbara Kruse | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $354,088 |
29 | Asbell Farms LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $331,178 |
30 | Angelina Ortega | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $325,494 |
31 | Farming Technology Corporation | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $322,134 |
32 | Chiles Farm | Hooper, CO 81136 | $306,518 |
33 | Gerald Ziegler | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $288,326 |
34 | Scott Scidmore | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $281,475 |
35 | Jerry A Brown | Mosca, CO 81146 | $280,077 |
36 | R M & S M Family Farm LLC | Morrison, CO 80465 | $279,457 |
37 | Scidmore Farms | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $269,270 |
38 | Brownell Farms | Hooper, CO 81136 | $268,878 |
39 | Allen R Entz | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $264,939 |
40 | Jack Felmlee | El Prado, NM 87529 | $259,393 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”