Farm Subsidy information
Arapahoe County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Arapahoe County, Colorado, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arapahoe County, Colorado totaled $4,668,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nancy L Meier | Byers, CO 80103 | $48,241 |
22 | Thompson Farms & Feedlot Inc | Byers, CO 80103 | $46,767 |
23 | Greg Cowell | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $45,986 |
24 | Klausner Bros LLC | Roggen, CO 80652 | $44,396 |
25 | Kenneth Newby | Bennett, CO 80102 | $41,250 |
26 | Bradbury Associates Lllp | Lone Tree, CO 80124 | $41,069 |
27 | Dot X O Meg LLC | Strasburg, CO 80136 | $38,586 |
28 | Gunnar H Partnership Lllp | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $38,086 |
29 | Turecek Land & Cattle LLC | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $36,489 |
30 | Pauline Cowell | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $35,828 |
31 | Robert W Tscheschke | Byers, CO 80103 | $35,130 |
32 | Charles Klausner Damian Klausner George Klausner P | Roggen, CO 80652 | $34,879 |
33 | Gregory S Schoonveld | Strasburg, CO 80136 | $34,585 |
34 | Lawrence B Cowell Testamentary Family Trust | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $31,809 |
35 | John J Hanks | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $31,475 |
36 | Cassius A Middlemist | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $31,218 |
37 | Roy J Weisensee | Deer Trail, CO 80105 | $29,493 |
38 | Merlyn Atteberry | Bennett, CO 80102 | $29,176 |
39 | Kent Beichle | Bennett, CO 80102 | $28,770 |
40 | Craig Farms Gp | Byers, CO 80103 | $28,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”