Conservation Reserve Program in Baca County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,230
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Baca County, Colorado totaled $226,721,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Horse Creek Farms | Springfield, CO 81073 | $4,196,287 |
2 | William D Greathouse | Springfield, CO 81073 | $1,630,462 |
3 | Hatcher Land & Cattle Co | Liberal, KS 67901 | $1,509,894 |
4 | Robbins Ranches Inc | Walsh, CO 81090 | $1,261,664 |
5 | Commerce Ranch Inc | Walsh, CO 81090 | $1,198,863 |
6 | Rosalie Bitner | Walsh, CO 81090 | $1,194,827 |
7 | Arbuthnots Farm Inc | Springfield, CO 81073 | $1,102,343 |
8 | Patsy Howard | Springfield, CO 81073 | $1,080,913 |
9 | W W & G M Brinkley Revocable Trst | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,056,838 |
10 | Ewald C Peper | Adair, OK 74330 | $1,046,517 |
11 | Wilson Sylvester Huff Living Trus | Holly, CO 81047 | $1,039,228 |
12 | John W Brown | Campo, CO 81029 | $1,019,207 |
13 | Renner Land And Cattle Co | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $980,883 |
14 | Lusk Ranch | Springfield, CO 81073 | $976,234 |
15 | Valwal Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $956,111 |
16 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $950,072 |
17 | Gustav & Alyce Rosenheim Tr A | Boise, ID 83702 | $918,669 |
18 | Campo Farms Inc | Manter, KS 67862 | $913,646 |
19 | Dwight Sharpe | Walsh, CO 81090 | $907,205 |
20 | Winters Cattle Co | La Junta, CO 81050 | $885,254 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>