Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Bent County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 102
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Bent County, Colorado totaled $2,321,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas L Wallace | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $23,501 |
22 | Loran J Mick | Wiley, CO 81092 | $20,037 |
23 | Loyal And Ilene Stephens Revocable Trust | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $18,903 |
24 | Cross Seven Ranch Llp | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $18,115 |
25 | Tyler P Karney | Ordway, CO 81063 | $18,107 |
26 | Jake Tempel | Wiley, CO 81092 | $16,674 |
27 | Kris Hasser | Hasty, CO 81044 | $15,797 |
28 | Anthony Greenbank | Hasty, CO 81044 | $15,219 |
29 | Daniel G Direzza | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $14,979 |
30 | Turner Cattle Company | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $14,751 |
31 | D & J Farms LLC | Windsor, CO 80550 | $14,650 |
32 | Mr Jeffrey- Peaceful Valley Living Trust A Smith | Hasty, CO 81044 | $14,349 |
33 | David E Morgan | Hasty, CO 81044 | $13,041 |
34 | Stanley Cline | Wiley, CO 81092 | $12,732 |
35 | Gary Hall II | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $11,600 |
36 | , | $10,776 | |
37 | Clay Hasser | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $9,366 |
38 | Kenneth A Emick | Lamar, CO 81052 | $8,894 |
39 | Garrett Godfrey | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $8,182 |
40 | Mark A Thatcher | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $8,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”