Counter Cyclical Program in Bent County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 216
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bent County, Colorado totaled $993,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Irl Austin Miller | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $6,727 |
42 | Loyal & Ilene Stephens Revocable | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $6,659 |
43 | Walter Garcia | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $5,943 |
44 | Donald Downing | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $5,795 |
45 | Keding Family Living Trust | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $5,602 |
46 | David Dean Findley | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $5,587 |
47 | Steven R Shiba | Cedar Creek, TX 78612 | $5,567 |
48 | Dean Smartt | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $5,446 |
49 | Gale Tempel | Wiley, CO 81092 | $4,985 |
50 | Elk Mountain Cattle Co | La Junta, CO 81050 | $4,950 |
51 | Cynthia A Moore | Trinidad, CO 81082 | $4,920 |
52 | Turner Ranch Inc | La Junta, CO 81050 | $4,899 |
53 | Kenneth Wagner | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $4,874 |
54 | Colvin & Colvin | Wiley, CO 81092 | $4,816 |
55 | Johnnie Weber | Lamar, CO 81052 | $4,806 |
56 | Jake Obe Broyles | Lamar, CO 81052 | $4,691 |
57 | Curtis G Sniff | Mc Clave, CO 81057 | $4,601 |
58 | Scientific Trans Inc | Golden, CO 80402 | $4,340 |
59 | Souders Farms Inc | Wiley, CO 81092 | $4,289 |
60 | Dolores Direzza | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $4,115 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”