Farm Subsidy information
Bent County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Bent County, Colorado, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 867
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bent County, Colorado totaled $124,814,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ridley Farms And Ranches Lp | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $2,046,096 |
2 | Davidson Ranch Ltd Lllp | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,467,021 |
3 | Jack Sniff Ranch Inc | Hasty, CO 81044 | $1,381,946 |
4 | Karney Land & Cattle Inc | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,341,440 |
5 | Stanley Cline | Wiley, CO 81092 | $1,232,033 |
6 | Medlin Family Partnership | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $1,222,957 |
7 | Faye E Oberlander | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,140,337 |
8 | Ag Systems Management Lllp | Hasty, CO 81044 | $1,124,718 |
9 | Douglas L Howe | La Junta, CO 81050 | $1,092,822 |
10 | Miller Farms Inc | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,061,571 |
11 | Harrell Ridley | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,050,816 |
12 | Spady Brothers | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $1,039,311 |
13 | Jeffrey A Smith | Hasty, CO 81044 | $1,032,130 |
14 | J-s Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $989,496 |
15 | Verhoeff Farms Inc | Hasty, CO 81044 | $985,886 |
16 | Brown Brothers Inc | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $954,750 |
17 | John P Sutphin Jr | Lamar, CO 81052 | $943,143 |
18 | C Sue Root | Lamar, CO 81052 | $928,333 |
19 | Mike Alvin Spady | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $918,522 |
20 | S & S Land LLC | Ballwin, MO 63021 | $854,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>