Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Cheyenne County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 103
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Colorado totaled $230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Smokey Valley Inc | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $311 |
82 | Twin Pines | Stratton, CO 80836 | $295 |
83 | Ed Mousel | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $255 |
84 | F F Erker Estate | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $236 |
85 | Barbara Hornung | Stratton, CO 80836 | $209 |
86 | Leo Mousel | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $197 |
87 | The Lavern W & Vienna C Snodgrass Revocable Trust | Picayune, MS 39466 | $162 |
88 | Frank C Heins | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $160 |
89 | Mary J Roth Rev Trust | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $104 |
90 | Robert William Roth Sr Rev Trust | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $104 |
91 | Leander Brake | Wichita, KS 67203 | $57 |
92 | Thomas C Brake Revocable Trust | Wichita, KS 67206 | $57 |
93 | Steve Donnelly | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $52 |
94 | Gary Wheeler | Burlington, CO 80807 | $50 |
95 | Ernest K Sidebottom | Ransom, KS 67572 | $41 |
96 | Virgil L And Jean A Sidebottom Tr | Lyons, KS 67554 | $41 |
97 | Harold J Sidebottom Living Trust | Wichita, KS 67204 | $41 |
98 | Wayne E Sidebottom | Wichita, KS 67205 | $41 |
99 | Bernice L Sidebottom | Wichita, KS 67204 | $41 |
100 | B & C Farms Partnership | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $38 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”