Total Conservation Programs in Cheyenne County, Colorado, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 215
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cheyenne County, Colorado totaled $2,236,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Norman Arends-norman L Arends Living Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $3,868 |
142 | Doug Gibbs | Castle Rock, CO 80109 | $3,850 |
143 | Kyle G Gerweck | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,845 |
144 | Phyllis Erline Farney Estate | Burlington, OK 73722 | $3,786 |
145 | Ray I Jantz | Enid, OK 73703 | $3,630 |
146 | Michael Roy Jantz | Cherokee, OK 73728 | $3,628 |
147 | Rush Creek Station LLC | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $3,559 |
148 | Janey Clark | Norman, OK 73072 | $3,452 |
149 | Doris Leifermann Epperson | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $3,258 |
150 | Arlene Rockwell | Four Corners, WY 82715 | $3,257 |
151 | Campbell Family Trust | Riverton, WY 82501 | $3,209 |
152 | Donna Campbell | Riverton, WY 82501 | $3,209 |
153 | Devin Lee Dickey | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,122 |
154 | Wendy Sue Dickey | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,122 |
155 | Greg Roth | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $3,014 |
156 | The Fredrick Keith Konecne Family Trust | Broomfield, CO 80023 | $2,998 |
157 | Ken Keller | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $2,964 |
158 | Vance R Keller | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $2,964 |
159 | Dallas Snodgrass | Burleson, TX 76097 | $2,959 |
160 | Erik Snodgrass | Haslet, TX 76052 | $2,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”