Farm Subsidy information
Costilla County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Costilla County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 358
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Costilla County, Colorado totaled $25,121,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Carlos C Deleon | San Luis, CO 81152 | $12,647 |
142 | Charles Manzanares | Chama, CO 81126 | $12,481 |
143 | Valdez Rio Culebra Ranch | San Luis, CO 81152 | $12,402 |
144 | James Mondragon | San Pablo, CO 81152 | $12,298 |
145 | Clarence Vigil | Chama, CO 81126 | $12,210 |
146 | Franklin Sanchez | San Luis, CO 81152 | $12,095 |
147 | Eugene Lobato Sr | Chama, CO 81126 | $12,062 |
148 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,987 |
149 | Erminio Martinez | Taos, NM 87571 | $11,482 |
150 | Ernest I Sanchez | San Luis, CO 81152 | $11,317 |
151 | Ben Christensen | Blanca, CO 81123 | $11,301 |
152 | Frances Santisteven | San Acacio, CO 81151 | $11,089 |
153 | Quinlan Farms & Ranches Inc | San Acacio, CO 81151 | $10,989 |
154 | Gary Vigil | San Luis, CO 81152 | $10,924 |
155 | Chad V Rush | Manassa, CO 81141 | $10,795 |
156 | Robert A Romero | Taos, NM 87571 | $10,510 |
157 | Ruben Guardiola | La Salle, CO 80645 | $10,500 |
158 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $10,489 |
159 | Chad Vincent Rush | Manassa, CO 81141 | $10,287 |
160 | Thomas G Garcia Jr | San Luis, CO 81152 | $10,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”