Farm Subsidy information
Eagle County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Eagle County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eagle County, Colorado totaled $9,074,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gerard Brothers Partnership Lllp Dba Gerard Family | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $1,274,427 |
| 2 | Nottingham Ranch Company | Burns, CO 80426 | $1,128,789 |
| 3 | James Craig Bair | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $609,535 |
| 4 | The Piney Valley Ranches Trust | Vail, CO 81658 | $582,369 |
| 5 | James Craig Bair Ranch Co LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $507,363 |
| 6 | Steve Hammer | Burns, CO 80426 | $383,879 |
| 7 | Albertson Cattle Co Lllp | Burns, CO 80426 | $369,452 |
| 8 | Schlegel Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $326,763 |
| 9 | Eight Bar Ranch Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $292,657 |
| 10 | Wurtsmith Land & Catl Co Inc | Burns, CO 80426 | $265,017 |
| 11 | Schlegel Ranch Partnership Ltd | Burns, CO 80426 | $248,053 |
| 12 | Blue Hill Enterprises Inc Dba Hammer Ranch | Burns, CO 80426 | $209,736 |
| 13 | Reverse Jl Bar Cattle Co | Burns, CO 80426 | $197,310 |
| 14 | West Range Forest Products LLC | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $193,211 |
| 15 | Campbell Hansmire Sheep LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $186,839 |
| 16 | Kristine A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $136,910 |
| 17 | Kirk A Shiner | Dixon, WY 82323 | $127,892 |
| 18 | Mike Luark | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $115,910 |
| 19 | Ronald Chris Estes | Gypsum, CO 81637 | $100,811 |
| 20 | Wurtsmith Enterprises | Burns, CO 80426 | $94,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
