Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Fremont County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 76
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Fremont County, Colorado totaled $203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Barbara L Fisher | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $2,548 |
22 | Ira Lee Stepleton | Penrose, CO 81240 | $2,539 |
23 | Betty Ann Lewis | Colorado Springs, CO 80921 | $2,509 |
24 | Elsie H Ellis | Canon City, CO 81212 | $2,225 |
25 | Frank D Hardin | Florence, CO 81226 | $2,165 |
26 | Ada Micheli | Florence, CO 81226 | $2,145 |
27 | Cheryl Stephens | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,919 |
28 | Russell S Maytag | Pueblo, CO 81002 | $1,800 |
29 | James Like | Canon City, CO 81215 | $1,747 |
30 | Vern Lindner | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,721 |
31 | Richard J Shea | Penrose, CO 81240 | $1,695 |
32 | Michael Short | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,607 |
33 | Ron Claflin | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,585 |
34 | Ruby Mackenzie | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,497 |
35 | Stephen W Engle | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,453 |
36 | Beverley A Nichols | Hartville, MO 65667 | $1,418 |
37 | John H Sandefur | Penrose, CO 81240 | $1,356 |
38 | Muriel Lingo | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,346 |
39 | Tom L Jenkins | Canon City, CO 81212 | $1,267 |
40 | Rosemary Hanson | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $1,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”