Farm Subsidy information
Garfield County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Garfield County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 752
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garfield County, Colorado totaled $25,866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bill Porter | New Castle, CO 81647 | $88,975 |
82 | John S Jewell | Rifle, CO 81650 | $88,350 |
83 | Rita M Porter | New Castle, CO 81647 | $87,924 |
84 | Lazy H Slash Eleven LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 | $87,273 |
85 | Quarter Circle 8 Lllp | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $84,839 |
86 | Lazy 3x Sheep Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $84,010 |
87 | J Gentry | Rifle, CO 81650 | $80,294 |
88 | Donald Dorrell | Rifle, CO 81650 | $79,401 |
89 | Laura Sue Miller-kinney | Silt, CO 81652 | $78,722 |
90 | Dale Mcpherson | Silt, CO 81652 | $77,505 |
91 | Benzel Land Lllp | Sedona, AZ 86351 | $76,897 |
92 | Aspen Blue Sky Holdings LLC | Aspen, CO 81612 | $76,872 |
93 | Crystal River Ranch Llp | Denver, CO 80202 | $75,927 |
94 | Wayne Mccray | Silt, CO 81652 | $75,239 |
95 | J & L Equipment Leasing | De Beque, CO 81630 | $74,235 |
96 | Dee Blue | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $72,257 |
97 | John W Bershenyi | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $71,663 |
98 | Richard Morgan | New Castle, CO 81647 | $71,635 |
99 | Word To Word Family Limited Partn | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $71,119 |
100 | Max Macdonell | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $70,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”