Farm Subsidy information
Garfield County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Garfield County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 752
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garfield County, Colorado totaled $25,866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | J & S Nieslanik Llp | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $69,035 |
102 | John Nieslanik | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $67,797 |
103 | Belgum Livestock Co LLC | Glendora, CA 91740 | $67,605 |
104 | Samuel Soren Bevan | Silt, CO 81652 | $67,046 |
105 | Ronald R Dodd | Silt, CO 81652 | $66,564 |
106 | Dollie Prather | De Beque, CO 81630 | $65,107 |
107 | Arnold Mackley | Rifle, CO 81650 | $63,550 |
108 | Sharon Gardner | Parachute, CO 81635 | $62,236 |
109 | Hillside Rogue LLC | Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 | $60,871 |
110 | William L Prather | De Beque, CO 81630 | $60,227 |
111 | Kim O'neill | Silt, CO 81652 | $58,720 |
112 | Lindell R Scarrow | Woodrow, CO 80757 | $58,333 |
113 | Chanse Brackett | De Beque, CO 81630 | $57,797 |
114 | Glenwood Honey Farms | Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 | $57,275 |
115 | Donald G Price | Clayton, NY 13624 | $55,583 |
116 | Estate Of //richard Jolley | New Castle, CO 81647 | $55,281 |
117 | Michael Johnson | Rifle, CO 81650 | $53,716 |
118 | Mary Lou Deceased Jolley | New Castle, CO 81647 | $53,570 |
119 | David K Danciger | Carbondale, CO 81623 | $51,243 |
120 | Donald E Mackey | De Beque, CO 81630 | $50,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”