Deficiency Payment in Larimer County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 179
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Larimer County, Colorado totaled $241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | The Colorado College | Colorado Springs, CO 80903 | $53 |
122 | Longview Ltd Partnership | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $53 |
123 | Mountain View Inv Co | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $53 |
124 | Patricia Denny | San Antonio, TX 78261 | $52 |
125 | Schwarz Farms LLC | Loveland, CO 80537 | $50 |
126 | Barry Sikes | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $39 |
127 | Lexenia Mitze | Colorado Springs, CO 80915 | $38 |
128 | Wilson South Ltd | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $38 |
129 | Mckee Medical Center Foundation | Loveland, CO 80539 | $37 |
130 | Landowners Assoc For Ponderosa Ri | Loveland, CO 80538 | $36 |
131 | Harvest Gold Farms | Loveland, CO 80539 | $32 |
132 | Vanguard Vi Ltd | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $32 |
133 | Deines Ag/lvstk Co Trust | Loveland, CO 80538 | $30 |
134 | Charles Bishopp | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $28 |
135 | Amo L Rinker | Toquerville, UT 84774 | $27 |
136 | Patricia Tucker | Warrenton, VA 20186 | $25 |
137 | Klaus I Kunter | Edwards, CO 81632 | $25 |
138 | Investment Systems Inc | Windsor, CO 80550 | $25 |
139 | Loveland Taft Ltd | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $25 |
140 | Amelia Cooper | Dayton, OH 45405 | $20 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”