CCC Organic Programs in Larimer County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Larimer County, Colorado totaled $32,623 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hazel Dell Mushrooms, LLC | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $3,500 |
2 | Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Markets , Inc | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $3,254 |
3 | Ackerman Farms Inc | Wellington, CO 80549 | $3,252 |
4 | Silver Reef Organic Farms LLC | Wellington, CO 80549 | $3,004 |
5 | Grouse LLC | Wellington, CO 80549 | $2,457 |
6 | Motherlove Herbal Company | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $2,252 |
7 | Seaworth Ag Enterprises Inc | Wellington, CO 80549 | $2,250 |
8 | Whr Farms LLC Dba Roth Organic Farms | Longmont, CO 80504 | $2,250 |
9 | , | $2,250 | |
10 | Karen Hare, R.d. Nutrition Services, Inc. Dbo Hare | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $2,200 |
11 | Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottag | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $1,250 |
12 | Colorado State University | Fort Collins, CO 80523 | $1,250 |
13 | Fossil Creek Farms LLC | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $750 |
14 | Old Town Distilling Co Inc | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $704 |
15 | Matsuda Enterprises | Wellington, CO 80549 | $500 |
16 | Rocky Mountain Pumpkin Ranch Inc/dba Full Circle F | Longmont, CO 80503 | $500 |
17 | Green Cherry Organics | Fort Collins, CO 80521 | $500 |
18 | Old Town Distilling Co | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”