Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Las Animas County, Colorado, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 118
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Las Animas County, Colorado totaled $1,398,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas R Goodrich | Kim, CO 81049 | $12,246 |
42 | Leann N Malespini | Trinidad, CO 81082 | $12,096 |
43 | Unwin Family Ranch Llp | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $11,562 |
44 | Robert Michael Pearce | Kim, CO 81049 | $11,514 |
45 | Mark Wilson | Las Animas, CO 81054 | $11,442 |
46 | Robert Pickard | Branson, CO 81027 | $11,160 |
47 | Jerry Palmer | Kim, CO 81049 | $11,097 |
48 | Platt Ranch Inc | Kim, CO 81049 | $10,986 |
49 | The Williams Land & Cattle Company | Walsenburg, CO 81089 | $10,956 |
50 | Johnnie Mayhan | Branson, CO 81027 | $10,740 |
51 | Brett Balenseifen | Kim, CO 81049 | $10,533 |
52 | Norma Lou Dougherty | Happy, TX 79042 | $10,526 |
53 | Douglas Taylor | Trinidad, CO 81082 | $10,062 |
54 | Lonnie Jackson | Kim, CO 81049 | $9,948 |
55 | Kelby G Bond | Avondale, CO 81022 | $9,868 |
56 | Tylor D Bond | Avondale, CO 81022 | $9,868 |
57 | Thomas James Goodrich | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $9,810 |
58 | Yocam Ranch Operations LLC | Kim, CO 81049 | $9,708 |
59 | Scott R Gyurman | Haswell, CO 81045 | $9,354 |
60 | Cecil A Dougherty | Happy, TX 79042 | $8,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”