Total Conservation Programs in Logan County, Colorado, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 306
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Logan County, Colorado totaled $2,266,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Joseph L Samber Estate | Sterling, CO 80751 | $11,447 |
62 | Randy Carwin | Iliff, CO 80736 | $11,320 |
63 | Charles Lindstrom | Sterling, CO 80751 | $11,319 |
64 | Arnold & Rose Mary Piel Living Trust | Stoneham, CO 80754 | $11,167 |
65 | Kielian Family Marital Trust | Sidney, NE 69162 | $11,085 |
66 | Curtis R Benson And Dottie K Benson Irrevocable Tr | Brownsville, TX 78521 | $11,054 |
67 | Richard H Larson | Denver, CO 80233 | $10,841 |
68 | Boerner Inc | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $10,800 |
69 | Mcintire Land Co LLC | Sterling, CO 80751 | $10,711 |
70 | Thomas Koester | Sterling, CO 80751 | $10,504 |
71 | Barry Mason | Merino, CO 80741 | $10,370 |
72 | B J & Frances E Peggram Rvoc Fam Trust | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $10,358 |
73 | Sharon Gay Mcdaniel Consolidated Tr | Haxtun, CO 80731 | $10,300 |
74 | Mertens Cattle Company | Delta, CO 81416 | $10,232 |
75 | Myrna Corsentino | Golden, CO 80401 | $9,746 |
76 | Pheasant Run Farm LLC | Parker, CO 80134 | $9,337 |
77 | Jay Ziegler Revocable Trust | Riverton, NE 68972 | $9,248 |
78 | Michael J Hill | Peetz, CO 80747 | $9,192 |
79 | Richard A Hutt | Sterling, CO 80751 | $9,066 |
80 | Joel Felzien | Sterling, CO 80751 | $8,991 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”