Farm Subsidy information
Mesa County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Mesa County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,240
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mesa County, Colorado totaled $68,741,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jay G Van Loan | Glade Park, CO 81523 | $390,035 |
22 | Max L Noland Family Limited Partn | Palisade, CO 81526 | $375,579 |
23 | Harvestime Enterprises Inc | Palisade, CO 81526 | $366,762 |
24 | Flynn Farms Inc | Fruita, CO 81521 | $360,349 |
25 | Calvin Wayne Waters | Fruita, CO 81521 | $355,189 |
26 | Scott P Long | Collbran, CO 81624 | $349,268 |
27 | Campbell & Hansmire Sheep | Mack, CO 81525 | $341,552 |
28 | Hawkeye Ditch Company | Fruita, CO 81521 | $337,127 |
29 | G Allen Reid | Loma, CO 81524 | $331,330 |
30 | Ty R Bevan | Molina, CO 81646 | $327,349 |
31 | Nichols & Son Land And Cattle Company LLC | Mesa, CO 81643 | $326,197 |
32 | Young Brothers LLC | Collbran, CO 81624 | $322,556 |
33 | Bernal Farms | Loma, CO 81524 | $320,170 |
34 | Kokopelli Farms Inc | Palisade, CO 81526 | $318,727 |
35 | Holyoak Land & Livestock LLC | Collbran, CO 81624 | $318,536 |
36 | Clark Family Orchards Inc | Palisade, CO 81526 | $311,241 |
37 | J & J Livestock Inc | Loma, CO 81524 | $283,385 |
38 | Alfred Giles And Sons | Loma, CO 81524 | $282,431 |
39 | John W Brach | Loma, CO 81524 | $279,883 |
40 | Lazy 3x Sheep Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $279,332 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”