Production Flexibility Program in Montezuma County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 405
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Montezuma County, Colorado totaled $1,238,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale Murphy | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,912 |
62 | Rodney Daves | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,893 |
63 | Kenneth R Sinclair | Tallahassee, FL 32308 | $4,827 |
64 | Thomas William Gilliland | Lewis, CO 81327 | $4,766 |
65 | Ben L Lanier | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,766 |
66 | Eddie D Oliver | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,632 |
67 | Timothy A Lanier | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,613 |
68 | Merritt Farms Inc | Cortez, CO 81321 | $4,464 |
69 | Godwin Levi Oliver | Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 | $4,428 |
70 | Gay W Odell Estate | Lewis, CO 81327 | $4,298 |
71 | Arthur Wilson Estate | Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 | $4,190 |
72 | Darlene Bangs | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $4,002 |
73 | John Klock | Tempe, AZ 85283 | $3,744 |
74 | Scott Oliver | Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 | $3,730 |
75 | Glenna J Harris | Lewis, CO 81327 | $3,655 |
76 | Lloyd Scott Hartle | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $3,594 |
77 | James G Cole | Twin Falls, ID 83303 | $3,540 |
78 | Jim Applin | Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 | $3,526 |
79 | Richard Carl Tucker | Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 | $3,520 |
80 | Wesley Wilson | Pleasant View, CO 81331 | $3,479 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”