Farm Subsidy information
Morgan County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Morgan County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,861
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Morgan County, Colorado totaled $385,016,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Magnum Cattle Co LLC | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $809,638 |
82 | Reuben Bostron Farms Inc | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $791,635 |
83 | Mark Rusch | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $788,272 |
84 | Schick Farms Inc | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $778,867 |
85 | Hallahan Farm & Dairy | Brush, CO 80723 | $769,427 |
86 | Scott And Joyce Kembel Partnershi | Brush, CO 80723 | $761,271 |
87 | Steven Duane Bruntz | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $752,706 |
88 | Harold Gene Shaver Sr | Erie, CO 80516 | $752,668 |
89 | Randy Fiscus | Brush, CO 80723 | $749,557 |
90 | Lauck Farms Inc | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $749,496 |
91 | O'daniel Farms | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $744,747 |
92 | Ronald A Cross | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $740,576 |
93 | Daniel Lester Busch | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $737,952 |
94 | Douglas John Chalk | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $736,430 |
95 | David A Knievel | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $734,821 |
96 | Jess Farms | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $726,374 |
97 | Allyn & Bradley Wind | Brush, CO 80723 | $723,880 |
98 | F & C Farms Lp | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $719,523 |
99 | Stanley G Potthoff | Wiggins, CO 80654 | $705,838 |
100 | K C Scott Family Ltd Partnership | Salem, OR 97306 | $703,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”