Total Conservation Programs in Morgan County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 835
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Morgan County, Colorado totaled $75,343,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | B B Peterson & Son Inc | Brush, CO 80723 | $123,636 |
162 | City Of Ft Morgan | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $123,507 |
163 | Parker Ranches Lllp | Denver, CO 80206 | $120,363 |
164 | Paul R Johnson | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $120,151 |
165 | Gloria J Sandstedt | Sterling, CO 80751 | $118,464 |
166 | Beverly Watson | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $116,780 |
167 | Barbara Mckenzie | Beaumont, CA 92223 | $115,633 |
168 | Mary Ann Bernritter Trust | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $115,594 |
169 | Mbi Land Company | New Raymer, CO 80742 | $114,497 |
170 | Kelly S Whitney | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $114,326 |
171 | Estate Of Wesley Sherman Wolever | Merino, CO 80741 | $113,027 |
172 | Kenneth Mccloud | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $112,753 |
173 | Darrel Dilley | La Salle, CO 80645 | $112,548 |
174 | David Dilley | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $112,535 |
175 | Stephen R Newsom | Limon, CO 80828 | $109,859 |
176 | Alice Jensen | Golden, CO 80401 | $109,007 |
177 | Anna Belle Knight | Brush, CO 80723 | $108,750 |
178 | Kenneth Foley | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $107,415 |
179 | Grooms Music Co Inc | Brush, CO 80723 | $104,961 |
180 | Kenneth V Whitney | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $104,946 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”