Farm Subsidy information
Prowers County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Prowers County, Colorado, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 818
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Prowers County, Colorado totaled $21,443,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mitchell Mauch | Lamar, CO 81052 | $51,260 |
62 | Marjorie Jean Dorenkamp Trust No 1 | Holly, CO 81047 | $50,016 |
63 | Georgetta L Tempel | Wiley, CO 81092 | $49,814 |
64 | Zions First National Bank ** | Idaho Falls, ID 83402 | $49,593 |
65 | Hays Conservation Reserve Program Property Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $49,025 |
66 | Perry J Tempel | San Diego, CA 92109 | $48,369 |
67 | William J Sparks | Springfield, CO 81073 | $47,824 |
68 | Jack Bamber | Lamar, CO 81052 | $47,569 |
69 | Lane Malone | Holly, CO 81047 | $47,191 |
70 | Russell And Linda Putnam Living Trust | Columbia, MO 65202 | $46,876 |
71 | Kyle D Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $46,484 |
72 | Jensen Stulp | Lamar, CO 81052 | $46,013 |
73 | Mary Rushton | Holly, CO 81047 | $45,184 |
74 | Colorado East Bank & Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $44,846 |
75 | Linda Paulsen | Lamar, CO 81052 | $44,731 |
76 | Xs Ranch LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $44,685 |
77 | Logan Dorenkamp | Holly, CO 81047 | $44,395 |
78 | Ross Peterson Farms LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $44,150 |
79 | John P Sutphin III | Lamar, CO 81052 | $42,547 |
80 | Wheatland Ag Inc | Holly, CO 81047 | $42,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”