Total Conservation Programs in Prowers County, Colorado, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 281
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Prowers County, Colorado totaled $2,990,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lindsay R Walker | Springfield, CO 81073 | $8,681 |
102 | Don Cooper | Perryton, TX 79070 | $8,602 |
103 | Albert Borg Revocable Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $8,532 |
104 | Debra Ann Wells | Lamar, CO 81052 | $8,169 |
105 | Jerimiah Josha Wells | Lamar, CO 81052 | $8,169 |
106 | Sidni B Staley | Garden City, KS 67846 | $8,078 |
107 | Anne Robinson | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $7,883 |
108 | Roland Alexander Thompson | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $7,883 |
109 | Tunis Family Farm Partnership | Lamar, CO 81052 | $7,866 |
110 | Dave Pollart | Holly, CO 81047 | $7,589 |
111 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $7,568 |
112 | Robert - York Trust L York | Garden City, KS 67846 | $7,155 |
113 | Rosemary - York Trust Agreement York | Garden City, KS 67846 | $7,155 |
114 | Tommy D Seufer | Canon City, CO 81212 | $7,049 |
115 | Daniel D Crockett | Brighton, CO 80601 | $7,044 |
116 | Richard Barrow | Lamar, CO 81052 | $7,023 |
117 | Davidson-seufer Irrevocable Trust | Holly, CO 81047 | $7,008 |
118 | Barbara A Keener Rev Tr | Ardmore, OK 73402 | $6,976 |
119 | Donna L Wygle Rev Tr | Pratt, KS 67124 | $6,976 |
120 | Sandra Kay Hughs Ellis | Granada, CO 81041 | $6,965 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”