Loan Deficiency in Prowers County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 960
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Prowers County, Colorado totaled $12,348,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Blake C Dunn | Bristol, CO 81047 | $96,030 |
22 | David Heck | Lamar, CO 81052 | $95,538 |
23 | Marvin Rushton | Holly, CO 81047 | $93,271 |
24 | X-y Farms Sll | Tribune, KS 67879 | $92,958 |
25 | Clifton Gourley | Walsh, CO 81090 | $92,661 |
26 | Baileys Inc | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $91,265 |
27 | Dale Jewell Seufer | Holly, CO 81047 | $82,296 |
28 | David L Wagner | Holly, CO 81047 | $81,206 |
29 | Fara Gourley | Walsh, CO 81090 | $80,436 |
30 | Barth Farms Inc | Holly, CO 81047 | $76,010 |
31 | The Richard Clede Widener Sr Family Trust | Lamar, CO 81052 | $74,720 |
32 | Jay Sneller | Wiley, CO 81092 | $72,946 |
33 | Thomas Jagers | Campo, CO 81029 | $71,276 |
34 | Roberta M Willhite Revocable Trus | Holly, CO 81047 | $70,921 |
35 | Delmar L Holmes Trust | Holly, CO 81047 | $70,007 |
36 | Dwain W Eaton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $69,212 |
37 | Douglas Melcher | Holly, CO 81047 | $69,124 |
38 | Mitchell Mauch | Lamar, CO 81052 | $68,993 |
39 | Kenneth Christian | Holly, CO 81047 | $68,495 |
40 | John Mccracken | Holly, CO 81047 | $68,036 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”