Farm Subsidy information
Rio Grande County, Colorado
Total Subsidies in Rio Grande County, Colorado, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 100
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rio Grande County, Colorado totaled $7,616,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael M Mitchell | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $32,846 |
42 | Glenalee Mitchell | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $32,846 |
43 | Curto Family Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $32,720 |
44 | Pro Mountain Farms LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $30,829 |
45 | Triple M Farms LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $30,288 |
46 | Pro Mountain Farms 2 LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $29,462 |
47 | Galen R Harrison | Center, CO 81125 | $28,354 |
48 | M Lee Prentice | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $26,206 |
49 | Brian C Rue | South Fork, CO 81154 | $22,917 |
50 | Andrea Rue | South Fork, CO 81154 | $22,917 |
51 | Diamond D Bar Ranch LLC | Del Norte, CO 81132 | $22,652 |
52 | Howard V Lester | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $22,632 |
53 | Iron Creek LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $21,581 |
54 | Cody Carpenter | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $21,539 |
55 | Mitchell Family Farms LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $21,524 |
56 | Lee A Welch | Center, CO 81125 | $20,694 |
57 | Koehn Irrevocable Trust Agreement | Center, CO 81125 | $19,742 |
58 | J D S Farms LLC | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $19,479 |
59 | Chad N Cochran | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $19,212 |
60 | Stanton W Johnson | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $19,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”