Total Conservation Programs in Weld County, Colorado, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,905
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Weld County, Colorado totaled $219,252,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Patsy June Johnson | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $379,678 |
142 | Kanode Ranch Inc | Ault, CO 80610 | $379,344 |
143 | Judith A Hobart | Florence, MN 56170 | $378,006 |
144 | Cary L Wickstrom | Orchard, CO 80649 | $376,605 |
145 | Mildred Diehl | Ault, CO 80610 | $374,569 |
146 | Tony Joska | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $373,723 |
147 | William Howard Everitt | Akron, CO 80720 | $372,539 |
148 | Warren R Brown | Spring, TX 77379 | $372,368 |
149 | Franklin E Hobart Jr | Crooks, SD 57020 | $372,064 |
150 | Robert Poston Rev Trust | Pine Bluffs, WY 82082 | $370,546 |
151 | Pfeuffer Investment Properties LLC | Los Angeles, CA 90064 | $370,479 |
152 | Larry K Klinginsmith | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $365,904 |
153 | Reid Ranches Co | Roggen, CO 80652 | $365,137 |
154 | Douglas John Chalk | Fort Morgan, CO 80701 | $361,385 |
155 | Rouse Farms Co | Nunn, CO 80648 | $357,500 |
156 | Erker Farms Inc | Roggen, CO 80652 | $356,936 |
157 | Paul W Walter | Lake Quivira, KS 66217 | $356,250 |
158 | R Wayne Walter | Haines, AK 99827 | $356,250 |
159 | Dale Schmeeckle & Edith M Schmeeckle Trst | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $352,564 |
160 | Mertens Bros Inc | New Raymer, CO 80742 | $351,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”