Conservation Reserve Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $302,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | State Of Connecticut | Hartford, CT 06106 | $90,006 |
2 | Schanz Farm Inc | Northford, CT 06472 | $64,360 |
3 | Freunds Farm Inc | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $35,787 |
4 | William Ireland III | Chaplin, CT 06235 | $16,378 |
5 | Bina Kesten | Farmington, CT 06032 | $14,075 |
6 | State Of Connecticut | Marlborough, CT 06447 | $9,102 |
7 | Town Of Middlefield | Middlefield, CT 06455 | $8,581 |
8 | Bina Kesten | Hartford, CT 06103 | $8,269 |
9 | Hindinger Farm LLC | Hamden, CT 06514 | $7,969 |
10 | Tilden Southack | Sharon, CT 06069 | $7,260 |
11 | Charles P Belden | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $7,140 |
12 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $5,677 |
13 | Lois Ewen | Milmay, NJ 08340 | $5,187 |
14 | Ed And Matt Platt | Southbury, CT 06488 | $4,695 |
15 | Wellington Ewen | Williams, OR 97544 | $4,279 |
16 | Bahler Farms Inc | Ellington, CT 06029 | $4,169 |
17 | Gordon Drazen | Cheshire, CT 06410 | $2,954 |
18 | Ireland Farm | Chaplin, CT 06235 | $1,742 |
19 | John O. Dill | East Hampton, CT 06424 | $1,581 |
20 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $1,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>