Counter Cyclical Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 313
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $1,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bradway Farm Inc | Stafford Springs, CT 06076 | $9,782 |
42 | Joseph W Majcher | Preston, CT 06365 | $9,490 |
43 | Harvey Polinsky | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $9,370 |
44 | House Of Hayes LLC | North Granby, CT 06060 | $9,364 |
45 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $9,114 |
46 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $8,987 |
47 | Marc J Wolf Rew Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $8,885 |
48 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $8,883 |
49 | Roaring Brook Farms | Ellington, CT 06029 | $8,784 |
50 | May Hill Farm LLC | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $8,557 |
51 | Terry M Tanner | Warren, CT 06777 | $8,530 |
52 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $8,328 |
53 | Hillyland Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $8,177 |
54 | Frederick B Plumb III | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $8,033 |
55 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $8,008 |
56 | Benjamin J Bielonko II | Suffield, CT 06078 | $7,594 |
57 | Philip W Grindrod | Sharon, CT 06069 | $7,562 |
58 | Sunnyside Farm L L C | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $7,428 |
59 | Collins Powder Hill Farm | Enfield, CT 06082 | $7,316 |
60 | Robert A. & Stephanie J. Page | North Branford, CT 06471 | $7,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”