Direct Payment Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 439
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $6,704,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bielonko Farms LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $26,178 |
62 | University Of Connecticut | Storrs Mansfield, CT 06269 | $25,051 |
63 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $24,943 |
64 | John Vincent Bottass | Salisbury, CT 06068 | $24,875 |
65 | White Ayr Farms LLC | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $24,701 |
66 | John H Kimberly | New Milford, CT 06776 | $24,550 |
67 | Kenneth M & Suzanne R Buell Rock Maple Farm | Eastford, CT 06242 | $24,435 |
68 | Triangle A Ranch LLC | New Haven, CT 06513 | $24,210 |
69 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $22,947 |
70 | Weigold Farms Llp | Torrington, CT 06790 | $22,870 |
71 | Dennis Jasmine | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $22,809 |
72 | Ridgeview LLC | Northford, CT 06472 | $22,790 |
73 | Thomas R Davis Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $22,662 |
74 | Marc J Wolf Rew Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $22,465 |
75 | Duane Button Dba Buttonwould Farm | Griswold, CT 06351 | $22,429 |
76 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $21,496 |
77 | Robert A. & Stephanie J. Page | North Branford, CT 06471 | $21,437 |
78 | Leo A Grouten II | Farmington, CT 06032 | $21,414 |
79 | Rockwood Farm | Granville, MA 01034 | $21,388 |
80 | Porter Farms Inc. | Hebron, CT 06248 | $21,208 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”