Market Loss Assistance Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 578
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $6,898,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stuart E Gadbois | Salem, CT 06420 | $33,433 |
62 | Andrew Davis Farm | Sterling, CT 06377 | $33,314 |
63 | Segalla Farm | Canaan, CT 06018 | $32,941 |
64 | Lanz Dairy | Ellington, CT 06029 | $32,618 |
65 | Burroughs Brothers | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $32,174 |
66 | Charles Griskauskas | Syracuse, NY 13215 | $31,953 |
67 | Tiffany Farms | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $31,640 |
68 | Richard & Joan Butkus | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $31,412 |
69 | Raydongeo Farms II | Hampton, CT 06247 | $31,243 |
70 | Kenneth M & Suzanne R Buell Rock Maple Farm | Eastford, CT 06242 | $30,855 |
71 | Mihaliak Dairy Farm | Willington, CT 06279 | $30,694 |
72 | Frederick B Plumb III | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $30,599 |
73 | Richard Coombs | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $30,576 |
74 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $30,512 |
75 | Weigold Farms Llp | Torrington, CT 06790 | $29,938 |
76 | Foster Farm | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $29,540 |
77 | Roaring Brook Farms | Ellington, CT 06029 | $29,228 |
78 | Ernest Norman | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $29,202 |
79 | Szegda Farm LLC | Columbia, CT 06237 | $29,008 |
80 | Thomas R Coolidge | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $28,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”