SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 114
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $7,347,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven Stosonis | Poquonock, CT 06064 | $29,105 |
62 | Twin Hill Farm LLC | Scotland, CT 06264 | $24,628 |
63 | Gordon Bednarz | Glastonbury, CT 06033 | $24,617 |
64 | Robert Wodal | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $23,744 |
65 | Sheldon Mel Farm Gp | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $23,580 |
66 | Linda C Phillips | Enfield, CT 06082 | $23,315 |
67 | James P Bloznalis | Old Saybrook, CT 06475 | $21,314 |
68 | Joseph Dematteo III | Hamden, CT 06514 | $20,152 |
69 | Kolaczenko Farms LLC | Enfield, CT 06083 | $19,752 |
70 | Deborah Halladay Pierce | Suffield, CT 06078 | $18,063 |
71 | Brendan Kilrain | Feeding Hills, MA 01030 | $17,230 |
72 | Roger A Kolaczenko | Enfield, CT 06082 | $16,431 |
73 | James A Bloznalis | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $16,384 |
74 | Rothe Homestead Farm Gp | Ellington, CT 06029 | $15,949 |
75 | Charles Gegesky | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $15,344 |
76 | Woodstock Orchards LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $15,337 |
77 | S H Phillips Farm | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $14,802 |
78 | Paul Cavanna | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $14,789 |
79 | Kevin Bassette | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $14,009 |
80 | Rothe Partnership | Ellington, CT 06029 | $13,872 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”