Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,014
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $237,115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Elm Knoll Farm | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $439,032 |
82 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $437,672 |
83 | Sunnyside Farm L L C | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $432,456 |
84 | Kyle A Groszyk | Enfield, CT 06082 | $429,073 |
85 | Bradway Farm Inc | Stafford Springs, CT 06076 | $429,003 |
86 | Cecarelli Farms LLC | Northford, CT 06472 | $424,306 |
87 | Hindinger Farm LLC | Hamden, CT 06514 | $417,194 |
88 | Country Farm II LLC | Northford, CT 06472 | $416,559 |
89 | Thomas E Baggott Jr | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $411,977 |
90 | James A Bloznalis | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $409,183 |
91 | Donald Wagner | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $405,355 |
92 | Hannan Honey LLC | Southbury, CT 06488 | $394,588 |
93 | Christian Leaf LLC | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $384,583 |
94 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $381,162 |
95 | , | $376,585 | |
96 | Windsor Farms Inc - Peter Baggott | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $374,870 |
97 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $374,053 |
98 | Roaring Brook Farm LLC | Ellington, CT 06029 | $371,971 |
99 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $361,624 |
100 | Pinecroft Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $361,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”