Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,014
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $237,115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $361,197 |
102 | Zentek Farms LLC | Cheshire, CT 06410 | $356,491 |
103 | Edward Markowski Sr | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $344,987 |
104 | Kogut Nursery LLC | Meriden, CT 06450 | $343,178 |
105 | Kenneth M & Suzanne R Buell Rock Maple Farm | Eastford, CT 06242 | $342,762 |
106 | Sunset Hill Farm Inc | Canaan, CT 06018 | $341,752 |
107 | Hastings Farm LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $340,189 |
108 | Polek Brothers Tobacco LLC | Somers, CT 06071 | $338,710 |
109 | Dingess Farm | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $337,001 |
110 | William E Hastings Jr | Windsor, CT 06095 | $332,418 |
111 | Terry M Tanner | Warren, CT 06777 | $329,787 |
112 | Woodstock Orchards LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $315,861 |
113 | Franklin Farms Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $309,363 |
114 | Sheldon Mel Farm Gp | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $308,960 |
115 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $308,718 |
116 | Hastings Farm | Suffield, CT 06078 | $305,334 |
117 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $302,409 |
118 | Pollard Bros | Lakeville, CT 06039 | $301,697 |
119 | Andrew G Davis | Sterling, CT 06377 | $300,106 |
120 | Daniel J Beneski | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $299,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”