Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $18,732,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Paul Cavanna | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $16,348 |
102 | Scott's Fruit Farm | Glastonbury, CT 06033 | $15,731 |
103 | Hindinger Farm LLC | Hamden, CT 06514 | $15,350 |
104 | Normandry Farm LLC | Griswold, CT 06351 | $15,147 |
105 | Todd Hannan | Southbury, CT 06488 | $15,031 |
106 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $14,885 |
107 | Kirk Montstream | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $14,290 |
108 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $14,043 |
109 | Desmond Samuda | Hartford, CT 06112 | $14,008 |
110 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $13,869 |
111 | Thomas R Davis Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $13,376 |
112 | Samuel Averill | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $12,860 |
113 | Scotts Yankee Farmer LLC | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $12,455 |
114 | Hillyland Farm Dairy LLC | Windham, CT 06280 | $12,341 |
115 | Robert Futh Jr | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $11,930 |
116 | Birch Mill Farm Partnership | Canaan, CT 06018 | $11,260 |
117 | Brian Kelliher | Enfield, CT 06082 | $11,120 |
118 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $11,087 |
119 | Jon H Jonelis | Somers, CT 06071 | $10,529 |
120 | G & C Miner Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $10,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”