Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 141
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $1,813,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Edward J Mattern | Preston, CT 06365 | $2,260 |
102 | Mark Rzeznikiewicz | Dayville, CT 06241 | $2,225 |
103 | Michael D Rizzo | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $2,191 |
104 | Erwin C Wimler | Durham, CT 06422 | $2,045 |
105 | Thomas W Haggarty | Guilford, CT 06437 | $2,025 |
106 | C D Withington LLC Withington Far | Baltic, CT 06330 | $1,950 |
107 | Deerfield Farm LLC | Durham, CT 06422 | $1,949 |
108 | Rothe Homestead Farm Gp | Ellington, CT 06029 | $1,879 |
109 | Mihaliak Farm | Willington, CT 06279 | $1,837 |
110 | Allen Hill Farm LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $1,817 |
111 | Daniels Farm LLC | Middletown, CT 06457 | $1,650 |
112 | Dwight Warren Williams | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $1,612 |
113 | Coombs Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $1,602 |
114 | Scantic Valley Farm | Somers, CT 06071 | $1,599 |
115 | Jell LLC | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $1,582 |
116 | Bryan Augur | North Haven, CT 06473 | $1,515 |
117 | Oliver Scranton Jr | Guilford, CT 06437 | $1,429 |
118 | Alex Savitsky | Colchester, CT 06415 | $1,426 |
119 | Kevin Augur | North Haven, CT 06473 | $1,381 |
120 | David H Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $1,303 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”