Loan Deficiency in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 379
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Connecticut totaled $6,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard & Edward Fleming Ptr | Preston, CT 06365 | $15,031 |
122 | R E W Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $14,852 |
123 | Herbert L Congdon | Moosup, CT 06354 | $14,748 |
124 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $14,325 |
125 | Ranlom Dairy Farm | Ashford, CT 06278 | $14,240 |
126 | Hibbard Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $14,216 |
127 | Park Farm | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $13,975 |
128 | Deborah Coulter-fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $13,622 |
129 | Ernest Norman | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $13,518 |
130 | Thomas R Coolidge | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $13,419 |
131 | May Hill Farm LLC | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $13,069 |
132 | Dennis Jasmine | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $13,027 |
133 | Thomas E Knowlton | Ashford, CT 06278 | $12,899 |
134 | Mcknight Farm | Ellington, CT 06029 | $12,883 |
135 | Steven L Grabarek | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $12,806 |
136 | Hytone Farm LLC | Coventry, CT 06238 | $12,074 |
137 | Marc J Wolf Rew Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $11,994 |
138 | Hautboy Hill Farm | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $11,804 |
139 | David H Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $11,781 |
140 | Raydongeo Farms II | Hampton, CT 06247 | $11,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”