Direct Payment Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 439
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $6,704,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Jon D & Elizabeth Rabideau Partners | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $11,196 |
142 | Normandry Farm LLC | Griswold, CT 06351 | $11,170 |
143 | Oweneco Farms | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $11,165 |
144 | Gary A Piszczek Hellgate Farm | Preston, CT 06365 | $11,012 |
145 | Andrew Davis Farm | Sterling, CT 06377 | $10,955 |
146 | Damiani Farm | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $10,946 |
147 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $10,898 |
148 | Four Maples Farm Inc | Cornwall Bridge, CT 06754 | $10,777 |
149 | Edward A Platt III | Southbury, CT 06488 | $10,744 |
150 | Richard & Edward Fleming Ptr | Preston, CT 06365 | $10,545 |
151 | Richard G Cox | Preston, CT 06365 | $10,457 |
152 | R Allen Cockerline | Lakeville, CT 06039 | $10,370 |
153 | Hastings Farm LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $10,280 |
154 | Richard H Morgan | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $10,236 |
155 | Ronald Jordan | Sterling, CT 06377 | $10,209 |
156 | Mihaliak Dairy Farm | Willington, CT 06279 | $10,190 |
157 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $10,127 |
158 | Hillside Farm | Mansfield Center, CT 06250 | $10,054 |
159 | Thomas B Orr | Moosup, CT 06354 | $10,013 |
160 | Heinz M Seligman | Orange, CT 06477 | $9,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”