Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,014
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $237,115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Garden's Dream Farm LLC | Somersville, CT 06072 | $229,998 |
162 | Collins Powder Hill Farm | Enfield, CT 06082 | $229,930 |
163 | Sam Bridge Nursery & Greenhouses | Greenwich, CT 06830 | $227,345 |
164 | Hollandia Nurseries, LLC | Bethel, CT 06801 | $221,828 |
165 | Est/randy Vaszauskas | Southbury, CT 06488 | $217,720 |
166 | Windsway Farm | Coventry, CT 06238 | $217,467 |
167 | Jon D & Elizabeth Rabideau Partners | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $217,280 |
168 | Meadow Ridge Farm LLC | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $217,207 |
169 | Robert C Hinckley Jr | Westfield, MA 01085 | $216,761 |
170 | Jones Family Farms, LLC | Shelton, CT 06484 | $216,108 |
171 | Andre J Groszyk | Enfield, CT 06082 | $215,754 |
172 | Rosedale Farms Of West Hartford I | Simsbury, CT 06070 | $214,556 |
173 | Horton Farm | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $212,113 |
174 | Leland Pinney | Somers, CT 06071 | $211,681 |
175 | Nancy E Tabor | Columbia, CT 06237 | $210,496 |
176 | B W Bishop & Sons | Guilford, CT 06437 | $208,740 |
177 | Benjamin J Bielonko II | Suffield, CT 06078 | $208,256 |
178 | , | $207,916 | |
179 | Harry Klug | Torrington, CT 06790 | $207,634 |
180 | Sadie Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $203,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”