Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 76
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Connecticut totaled $251,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $5,352 | |
22 | Cato Corner Farm LLC | Colchester, CT 06415 | $5,187 |
23 | Sankow's Beaver Brook Farm LLC | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $4,617 |
24 | Gary A Piszczek Hellgate Farm | Preston, CT 06365 | $4,610 |
25 | Sweet Grass Creamery LLC | Preston, CT 06365 | $4,292 |
26 | The Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $3,893 |
27 | Alden A Miner | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $3,862 |
28 | Devil's Backbone Farm LLC | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $3,309 |
29 | C & G Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $3,124 |
30 | Edwin R Peck | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $3,089 |
31 | Gerald W Grabarek | Preston, CT 06365 | $2,938 |
32 | Edward W Fleming | Preston, CT 06365 | $2,919 |
33 | Ekonk Hill Turkey Farm LLC | Moosup, CT 06354 | $2,823 |
34 | Baldwin Brook Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $2,709 |
35 | M & K's Dairy LLC | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $2,505 |
36 | Hyde's Dairy Farm LLC | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $2,486 |
37 | Valley View Dairy LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $2,391 |
38 | David Fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,275 |
39 | Deborah Coulter-fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,275 |
40 | Joan S Veit | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $2,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”